User blog comment:Ladysarah27/Fusion Recipes/@comment-5626120-20121029102243/@comment-5433714-20121030025312

Thanks Lilgucs. Yes I believe it would be to time consuming to include all the results and it also might reflect inaccurate information because the dinos are grouped by biome instead of being shown individually. If I were to indicate the more likely results, how do you think I could do it? Certain dinos do seem to be weighted more for fusion, just as they are with random. So I can see how this would be helpful information.

Good luck with your blog. I will take a look at it when you post it. I think you are describing something I do as well. I look for the combination that seems to have the best odds. For instance, when I wanted a ghost pachy I fused a trice and a raptor because this combo gave me a 1 out of 3 chance as shown in my table. Other combos would have given up to a 1 out of 7 chance which is much worse. Originally when I was working on these tables (as you can see here), I only included the target dino with a percentage next to it. I decided to go with these tables that show all the possible dinos though, in case I am trying for more than one dino. If so, I can see which combo will allow me a chance at either of the dinos I want.

Thanks for taking a look at my blog and let me know what you think about showing the likely results.