User blog comment:RobinCarr/SuperDinoFusion/@comment-5477177-20121011051156

superfusion looks the same to me. no easy way to tabulate all the possible combinations comes to mind and i did not think of a simple way to present the potential of fusion.

b+b=-b is simple. the inclusion principle is simple. tinyco made the rest as complex as they could without giving everyone a stroke. one has to think they saw some charts somewhere...

therefore i can only suggest that we stick with simple. present the Universal Biome Laws as above, for each tier. that step is handy for users to consult. then we can tabulate from the results backwards and if a new pattern, perhaps of odds, emerges then design a better table based on that.

by the results backwards i do not mean anything pretty or easy to read, just a simple wide table for each dino and a cell for each fusion result, possibly a tab or row for each week of results per target dino. there is no need for thumbnails in those cells as we no longer predict which dinos are fused, just fill in the blanks style abbreviations for names and perhaps room for dino level if that becomes relevant and/or perhaps date. this keeps the reporting process simple and prevents the tables from becoming ungainly too quickly. consulting the tables can be quick. as others have said, people want to know how a dinoX occurs, we can make that left hand side information.

i know, my eyes tear up just thinking about it, how we will long for the good old days. we all probably need a good night of sleep too. that's all i have for the moment, unless we mail out wall charts daily.