Thread:MissT732/@comment-5433714-20130106093412/@comment-5433714-20130107210408

While adjusting these tables, I copied and pasted many cells and moved lots around because I was just checking to see how large they would become and not worried about preserving the data for my test. So there are probably more numbers that are actually incorrect at this point than just the ghost numbers. And no I did not use any numbers from the ghost blog, so all of the ghost numbers are wrong.

Yes, preserving the data accurately is extremely important. However, at this point, I believe the focus needs to be the layout and formatting. Are we willing to use these changes on the Fusion Reports page? If so, then the numbers should be checked and rechecked before these tables are put into place. Until a decision is made though, I think adjusting these numbers is superfluous.

I suggested to MissT last night that before any changes are implemented on the Fusion Reports page, I believe these new tables should be tested on a page (vs. a blog). This page would be a complete copy of the Fusion Reports page with the new tables and collapse features in use. We could make sure any kinks were worked out and that all of the data was correct on this test page before transferring anything to the current Fusion Reports page.

Oh and I checked the tables with my iPhone. Everything works fine but I would definitely not recommend viewing large tables on such a tiny screen, which is the case with the current tables as well. It definitely did not make my eyes happy :D