Talk:Village Roster/@comment-5220945-20120721230029

I think that the ordering is fine for now. I believe that there are still not aspects of the game not yet measured by the categories already listed. Keep in mind that there are probably a lot of people that want to make their village LOOK like a village. I mean, not all villagers want to eat just apple products and ride scooters. I think that some categories to measure these villages are needed. Some that come to mind are # of decorations and # of unique decorations. # of paths / tiles. Number of stores and number of unique stores. Maybe even the number of unused squares...some villagers might like a field with a few trees.

The game means different things to different people, and eventually people are going to want to compare or compete with someone who is playing in a similar way that they are playing. Someone who likes variety will not care to see a village full of food stores. And, someone who is trying to level as quickly as possible won't care how fast someone, who is "wasting space" on Pam trees, is leveling.

I think that even crystal stuff should be included. This is yet another aspect of comparison. A lot of people know that there have been and are ways to exploit the game, so who is doing what with those crystals. Who wouldn't like to see a beautifully decorated village with every single decoration and building ever. Not sure if that's possible, but...

My basic point is that there are currently only 8ish stats on the list and most of these are kind of inevitable, and don't show much "personality". Yes, people who have been playing for a while should stand out (should be date started, though, since days playing will increase by one each day). But people who like to look good while they are playing should as well.