Thread:RobinCarr/@comment-5218270-20120829140814/@comment-5103836-20120829154147

I'm not sure if the old tables still exist and are available somewhere, but they tracked hundreds of fusion reports over a couple months. The old fusion reports tracked both dino placement (top or bottom) as well as dino age (toddler/teen/adult). There did not appear to be any preferance for either placement or age on these tables. The distribution looked to be right around 50/50 so this information tracking was dropped from the new tables.

Now, that being said, version v1.14 may have changed one or both of these. I saw the above two theories pop up on the fusion page talk but, since then, myself and others have reported results contrary to the them. Many, including myself are still on the older version so this might be a difference in v1.13 and v1.14. I would suggest to keep tracking it on v1.14 results.

Personally I would like to see either one of the placement or age theories be true, as it would be much easier influenceing the outcome. But as of now it is not something I would count on.