Thread:Oioiaussie/@comment-1536121-20120910180022/@comment-5039776-20120911003919

I don't think this works, at least in my opinion.

What I had envisaged was

Typos -- Bugs -- Problems

(probably in reverse order as problems are more important than bugs and who really cares about typos anyway?)

All typos would be listed under typos, all bugs under bugs and all problems under problems. Maybe this would allow anchors.

The way it is now, each is listed in a kind of "importance" order, but as we know sometimes bugs come and go. In my mind, it's not too hard in the old table to figure out what bug is alive and what is fixed, so "tabbing by importance" is probably not as useful as tabbing by type of bug.

If you tab by type of bug, it would make the page considerably smaller and easier to navigate too.