Talk:Fusion Reports/@comment-5497587-20121201145848/@comment-5103836-20121201160601

This is not the only source of bias in the data. People will be far more excited about reporting a rare or new fusion than that 15th dimetrodon. Regardless, I stopped reporting results as it became apparent that those reports would simply skew the data, undermining the entire point of the project.

However, I think we need to be careful about encouraging 'multifusion' as it exploits Tinyco's poor coding and requires 3rd party programs. This is not a 'legitimate' in-game mechanic like hurry hatching and it has been decided that the use of hacks or exploits which may damage Tinyco's financial success should be avoided by the wikia.

I could produce hundreds of results in a day and the data set would be far cleaner than what is represented above, so the table upkeep has lost a little luster in my eyes. I knew it was just a matter of time before this pandoras box would have to be opened, and I have not shared my information up until now. But now you have given it a name and are asking for results and I think the wiki admins should weigh in on this to decide if we want to encourage cheats and exploits on the wiki, or like many other things, simply turn a bind eye to the method and just accept the results.