User blog comment:RobinCarr/SuperDinoFusion/@comment-5582789-20121011031730/@comment-5103836-20121011044359

I'm inclined to agree. If the question is always "how can I get dino X?" it makes sense to format the tables that way. This would work great if specific dinos make no difference in fusion and only biome is taken into consideration. This would mean most combinations would be able to be listed as:

DinoWanted1 = F+D F+T F+A

DinoWanted2 = D+F D+T D+A

etc..

So you would have a table of 32 rows, or 3 tables one for each tier, with each row a seperate dino followed by possible biome combinations. There are several unknowns here, like if different dinos that have the same biome contribute diffrently to the fusion results. Or if certain dinos are rarer than others for the same combinations For now it may be useful to track everything in the much more crowded 'supertable' to determine exactly what the new current rules of fusion are. If they end up as simple as I think they will, then a streamlined table can be condensed from it.