Thread:Oioiaussie/@comment-5222017-20120821010552/@comment-5039776-20120821015418

Hi again,

No-one accused you of vandalism.

What's the harm? First, we run the risk of over categorising, which I think we are very close to already, especially with dinos.

Second, as far as I understand it, and I could be wrong, only 1 dino can be active in each tier/biome at one time. Categories need to contain more than 1 thing to be useful, IMHO.

Adding to this, the admins are discussing with the members of the dino fusion theory group, how best to present it all. A lot of info has been written and we need to ensure it all fits together. This will come together very soon.

You might also recognise the paragraphs on each dino that gives the combos that will work, their likelihood of working and a link to the current active discussion page. These are already a useful addition to dino fusion.

Now, no-one is looking to destroy your work. I think active/inactive is a good idea, although as I understand it, the concept is dynamic. But we can cope with that. I invite you to complete it for each dino.

I would hope that before structural changes were made to the wiki, our members could bring their ideas to the admins for discussion. We'll give them consideration and revert. That does not mean we don't want you to contribute. That's what a wiki is about. However, if an admin makes a decision, in this case, that the categorisation is too specific, I would hope that this can be accepted.

Thank you for writing to me.

Helena