Talk:Original Theory of Dino Fusion/@comment-67.0.163.87-20120930154325

While the work that has been done to crack the code of dino fusion is laudable, I just thought I would make a brief point: I do not often post but I do check these pages periodically to see if the fusion tables have changed. In the past, I have noticed more and more examples of people posting fusions where the resulting dino is not from either parent's biome. I myself just fused a brontosaurus and a Lucky Mammoth and received an Ingridia. These pages seem to focus on the anomalous dino as purely a matter of activity (indeed, in many of the table, there is no option to post a result of an active dino but one received out of sequence) but if the number of reports about unusual biome results are true, there is far less assurance in the system above than in what dinos are active.