Talk:Original Theory of Dino Fusion/@comment-5222017-20120813215633

Great effort! Sounds compelling to me. :) I strongly agree that historical results must be preserved for two reasons: • It will help test theories like this one. • It will allow us to catch unlikely but nevertheless valid results. For comparison, consider the likelihood of randomly hatching rare dinos. If we used a table such as the old fusion table – i.e., where we discard results that haven’t occurred for the last 5 or so times – the table would almost always suggest that it is impossible to randomly hatch rare dinos.

A little while ago, I played around with a table format that would allow us to track all fusions (and attribute them to villages, which I also consider crucial!) Feel free to check out User:Justvisitin/Fusion reports (draft) and User:Justvisitin/Fusion reports (tier 1 draft).

With the new theory, we’d obviously want to include biome information (as icons?), but perhaps this format could be some sort of starting point.