User blog comment:Oioiaussie/Buy playgrounds? A common misconception!/@comment-5193239-20120613145255/@comment-115.64.152.178-20120614054720

Thank you for replying Oioiaussie. Sorry I misunderstand your purperse of this article. You are solely talking about the land based investement return, that will make VFT definetely in the lead. My point is it is not a practise advise for those 30s players to get rid of playgrounds, because most of them have not reallize that they need them...not to mention VFT. They are still struggling to save up to expand...while they have wasted a lot of land. If you grab a random 30s on the stream, you can see my point.

Here are some examples: not offense to these players, they just don't care about efficiency :)

Maclnniszoo, lv33. 6 Rock, 7 Wood, 5 food, 6 fur. 1/3 land is empty. No playgrounds, no VFT.

chchyy97, lv36. 6 Rock, 6 Wood, 6 food, 6 fur. The new expantion is empty. No playgrounds, no VFT.

Atnorwood, lv32. 3 Rock, 3 Wood, 4 food, 3 fur. His expanding costs 100,000. No playgrounds, no VFT. He is the typical one. It will take him at least 1 week to save up to expand, while he will place it with 10 VFT to fill in the small gap? Hardly think so. But if he replace the 13 resources into 30 playgrounds, that will change the whole picture of this player's future.

And monazoo61, Clare82, veenom...all the same.