Talk:Fusion Reports/@comment-5116140-20121117024426/@comment-5051663-20121117205733

Is there any evidence that choosing a biome that you *DON'T* want to have the smallest number of dinos in it increases the probability of getting the dino you *DO* want? From the tables I get the impression that the algorithm chooses a random biome (although I often wonder about the randomness of the random number generator), then independently chooses a random dino within that biome (Method 1). This is distinct from choosing a random dino in the 2 or 3 eligible biomes (Method 2). Method 2 would give me much greater than 50% Tier 1 forest dinos on any fusion where that biome is allowed, and Method 1 would give me 50% (different-biome fusion) or 33% (same-biome fusion). from recent experience, if anything it seems to discriminate against biomes with large numbers in them.